Home
 
Welcome to Rob Ryan's Webpage
The NAACP has the courage to call a Spade a Spade PDF Print E-mail
Written by Robert Ryan   
Sunday, 08 August 2010 21:24

Finally, the NAACP sees the elephant in the room and noticed that the War on Drugs is really a war on people.  Drugs. food, drinking etc etc has been used for a long long time as a way to control, prosecute. and imprison people who "we" essentiallly dont like.  From African Americians or BLACKS as they used to be called, to Mexicans (wet backs), Chinese (chinks), all the way back to the Irish (Micks) and further.  Ms Huffman gets it that the War on Drugs is a war on people we dont really like. 

According to former Dayton Legislator Ed Orlett, " Ms. Huffman correctly analyzes how the "War on Drugs" has become a war on families and results in the imprisonment of young black males more than any other cause."

Alice Huffman, President of the California NAACP, cleraly states that Marijuana Law Reform Is a Civil Rights Issue. 

Perhaps the NAACP President, Benjamin Todd Jealous, and Chairwoman, Roslyn M. Brock, will get it too.  Below iis Alice Huffman's thougts on Race and Drugs.


"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere," said the late Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on April 4, 1967 when he spoke out against the Vietnam War. At the time, he was roundly criticized by friend and foe alike for speaking out on an issue considered outside the purview of civil rights' leaders. Dr. King understood better than most at the time the true cost of war -- in lives lost, in futures squandered, in dreams deferred and in misspent resources. Eventually, a majority of Americans came to agree with him about the war in Vietnam but he did not live long enough to see the shift in public opinion. His moral courage lay in speaking out in the face of disagreement, caring more about his integrity than popularity.

As leaders of the California NAACP, it is our mission to eradicate injustice and continue the fight for civil rights and social justice wherever and whenever we can. We are therefore compelled to speak out against another war, the so called "war on drugs." To be clear, this is not a war on the drug lords and violent cartels, this is a war that disproportionately affects young men and women and the latest tool for imposing Jim Crow justice on poor African-Americans.

We reject the oft-repeated but deceptive argument that there are only two choices for addressing drugs -- heavy handed law enforcement or total permissiveness. Substance abuse and addiction are American problems that affect every socioeconomic group, and meaningful public health and safety strategies are needed to address it. However, law enforcement strategies that target poor Blacks and Latinos and cause them to bear the burden and shame of arrest, prosecution and conviction for marijuana offenses must stop.

The report released this week by the Drug Policy Alliance confirmed that marijuana law enforcement in California disproportionately targets our youth. Despite consistent evidence that Black youth use marijuana at lower rates than Whites, in every one of the 25 largest counties in California, Blacks are arrested for marijuana possession at higher rates than Whites, typically at double, triple, or even quadruple the rate of Whites.

We believe whatever potential harms may be associated with using marijuana are more than outweighed by the immediate harms that derive from being caught up in the criminal justice system. Once a young person is arrested and brought under the justice system, he or she is more likely to get caught in the criminal justice system again. While most marijuana possession arrests do not result in long prison sentences, they almost all generate some entanglement in the net of the criminal justice system -- acquisition of arrest records, entry into criminal databases and the permanent stigmatization that arises from such involvement. A simple marijuana possession charge and $100 ticket starts a rap sheet that can leave an individual with a permanent record as a drug offender, which can easily be searched by employers, landlords, schools, credit agencies, licensing boards and banks.

Given the current economic crisis and high level of unemployment, particularly for Black men, do we really want to permanently handicap a person's ability to get an education, make a decent living and have a productive life because they used marijuana? Equally important -- is arresting people for possessing marijuana the best use of our scarce tax dollars? At a time when counties are laying off teachers, firefighters, child and senior care providers, can we justify wasting millions attempting to reduce demand for cannabis through law enforcement? How many more years should we wait before declaring that strategy a failure? Our recent history is filled with elected officials (including our current President), business leaders and others who have admitted using marijuana and were nonetheless able to lead productive lives. How many would have been able to do so if they were subjected to current law enforcement practices?

The California NAACP does not believe maintaining the illusion we're winning the "war on drugs" is worth sacrificing another generation of our young men and women. Enough is enough. We want change we can believe in; that's why we're supporting Prop. 19. Instead of wasting money on marijuana law enforcement, Prop. 19 will generate tax revenues we can use to improve the education and employment outcomes of our youth. Our youth want and deserve a future. Let's invest in people, not prisons. It is time to end the failed war on drugs by decriminalizing and regulating marijuana to save our communities.
 

Last Updated on Wednesday, 11 August 2010 19:28
 
Sting Advocates for Health-Based Drug Policies and an End to the Failed Drug War PDF Print E-mail
Written by Tony Newman, DPA   
Tuesday, 03 August 2010 05:50

StingSting, the internationally renowned musician and activist, is teaming up with the Drug Policy Alliance to call for an end to the failed war on drugs. Sting has written a passionate letter laying out the devastating consequences of the drug war and urging people to support the Drug Policy Alliance in advocating for sane drug polices.

 "The War on Drugs has failed—but it’s worse than that. It is actively harming our society. Violent crime is thriving in the shadows to which the drug trade has been consigned. People who genuinely need help can’t get it. Neither can people who need medical marijuana to treat terrible diseases. We are spending billions, filling up our prisons with non-violent offenders and sacrificing our liberties."

 Sting explains how he came across the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA) after reading an opinion piece by its executive director, Ethan Nadelmann, in the Wall Street Journal about the failures of drug prohibition. Ethan’s article "dared to say in print—in a thoughtful, meticulous argument—what everyone who has seriously looked at the issue has known for years: the War on Drugs is an absolute failure whose cost to society is increasingly unbearable and absolutely unjustifiable."

 DPA will be using Sting’s letter to recruit new members. Sting follows in the footsteps of long time DPA supporter Walter Cronkite, the legendary newsman who passed away late last year.

 "I am absolutely thrilled that Sting has agreed to join with DPA in advocating for an end to the drug war," said Ethan Nadelmann.  "Sting is taking leadership on this important issue and we know it will inspire others to speak out and get involved."

 In addition to writing the letter, Sting has also become a member of the honorary board of the Drug Policy Alliance. He joins other DPA honorary board members including former secretary of state George P. Shultz, Arianna Huffington, Russell Simmons, former president of the Czech Republic Václav Havel, and other prominent public advocates for drug policy reform.

 The Drug Policy Alliance is the nation's leading organization working to end the war on drugs and to promote new drug policies grounded in science, compassion, health and human rights. DPA is headquartered in New York City, with offices in California, Washington, DC, New Mexico, and New Jersey.

 
More Drug Law Enforcement Means More Violence PDF Print E-mail
Written by Phil Smith, DRCNET   
Sunday, 02 May 2010 07:59

The upsurge in violence that has shaken Mexico since President Felipe Calderon declared war on the so-called drug cartels more than three years ago was entirely predictable, according to a study based on decades of scientific literature. That review, which examined more than 300 studies dating back over 20 years, found that when law enforcement cracks down on drug use and sales, violence almost always increases.

Report: International Center for Science in Drug Policy

The study, "Effect of Drug Law Enforcement on Drug-Related Violence: Evidence from a Scientific Review", was released Tuesday by the International Center for Science in Drug Policy (ICSDP) http://www.icsdp.org/, a group of experts based in Britain and Canada. The ICSDP is led by Dr. David Nutt, the former chair of the British Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs,, who was sacked last fall for his heterodox views on the Labor government's drug policies.

The review found that when police get tough on drug crime, black market prices rise, sparking battles for control of lucrative drug markets. Similarly, when powerful drug bosses are arrested or killed by police, struggles to take their place lead to more violence. Researchers found that in 87% of the studies measuring the impact of increased drug law enforcement on violence, increased law enforcement led to increased violence. None showed an increase in drug law enforcement leading to a reduction in violence.

"Among all the harms related to drug use, it now seems that the very measures most countries use to reduce drug use are actually causing harms to drug users and the community," said Gerry Stimson, executive director of the International Harm Reduction Association, and chair of the Liverpool harm reduction conference where the study was presented. "Law enforcement is the biggest single expenditure on drugs, yet has rarely been evaluated. This work indicates an urgent need to shift resources from counterproductive law enforcement to a health-based public health approach."

 

"From a scientific perspective, the widespread drug violence in places like Mexico and the US, as well as the gun violence we are increasingly seeing on city streets in other countries, appears to be directly linked to drug prohibition," said coauthor Dr. Evan Wood, a researcher at the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS and founder of the ICSDP. "Prohibition drives up the value of banned substances astronomically, creating lucrative markets exploited by local criminals and worldwide networks of organized crime. Unfortunately, the evidence suggests that any disruption of these markets through drug law enforcement seems to have the perverse effect of creating more financial opportunities for organized crime groups, and gun violence often ensues."

Last Updated on Sunday, 02 May 2010 08:53
Click to continue
 
US house Passes Webb Bill PDF Print E-mail
Written by Tony Newman   
Tuesday, 27 July 2010 21:52

U.S. House Unanimously Passes Legislation Creating National Commission to Reduce Incarceration and Reform the Criminal Justice System.  Commission Would Likely Analyze Over-Incarceration, Failed Drug War Policies, Racial Disparities, and More

The U.S. House of Representatives passed bipartisan legislation tonight sponsored by Rep. William Delahunt (D-MA) which would create a national commission to study the U.S. criminal justice system and make recommendations for reform. The bill passed under an expedited process that presumes unanimity unless a member of Congress objects. No member objected.

“It is a sign of how quickly the tide has turned against punitive criminal justice policies that this bill passed without opposition,” said Bill Piper, director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance. “Prisons are overflowing at great taxpayer expense, in large part because of the failed war on drugs, and members of Congress are finally saying enough is enough, we need ideas for reform.”

The House bill is identical to a bill in the U.S. Senate introduced by Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA). That bill has passed the Senate Judiciary Committee and will most likely be voted on in the full Senate sometime this year. Sen. Webb (D-VA) has said, “either we have the most evil people in the world or we are doing something wrong with the way we approach the issue of criminal justice.” And “the central role of drug policy in filling our nation's prisons makes clear that our approach to curbing illegal drug use is broken.”

It is widely believed that the national commission created by Sen. Webb’s and Rep. Delahunt’s legislation would make recommendations for reducing incarceration, reforming U.S. drug policy, eliminating racial and gender disparities, improving re-entry efforts, and expanding access to substance abuse treatment, mental health services and health care.

“The House has spoken decisively. Now it is time for Senators to act,” Piper said. “Sen. Webb’s and Rep. Delahunt’s bipartisan commission legislation needs to be passed quickly before the war on drugs and punitive criminal justice system bankrupt our country and destroy more lives.”

 
Marc Emery " Prince of Pot" Extradition clock is ticking PDF Print E-mail
Written by Phillip S. Smith, DRCNET   
Sunday, 11 April 2010 09:11

Canadian "Prince of Pot" Marc Emery's battle to avoid being extradited to the US to serve a five-year federal prison sentence for selling pot seeds over the Internet continues as the clock ticks down toward May 10 -- the date by which Canadian Justice Minister Rob Nicholson is to decide whether to okay his extradition or not. Emery and his supporters are fighting to the bitter end, and they're picking up some significant support along the way.

Last month, members of all three major English speaking political parties, including the ruling Conservatives, handed in 12,000 signatures on petitions to parliament demanding he not be extradited and addressed the House of Commons on the issue. Shortly thereafter, the French speaking Bloc Quebecois announced it, too, was joining the cause of keeping Emery in Canada.

Emery was Canada's best known marijuana legalization advocate and a leading funder of marijuana reform groups there and in other countries when he was arrested in Vancouver on a US warrant for marijuana seed-selling after being indicted by a federal grand jury in Seattle. He faced up to life in prison under the US charges.

Emery, his supporters, and other marijuana reformers have argued that he was arrested for political reasons -- for his support of the legalization cause -- and the gleeful words of then DEA administrator Karen Tandy provided valuable ammunition for the claim. Emery's arrest was "a significant blow not only to the marijuana trafficking trade in the US and Canada, but also to the marijuana legalization movement," Tandy said in a statement the day of the bust.

"His marijuana trade and propagandist marijuana magazine have generated nearly $5 million a year in profits that bolstered his trafficking efforts, but those have gone up in smoke today. Hundreds of thousands of dollars of Emery's illicit profits are known to have been channeled to marijuana legalization groups active in the United States and Canada. Drug legalization lobbyists now have one less pot of money to rely on," Tandy gloated.

For four years, he and his employees and fellow indictees, Michelle Rainey and Greg Williams, negotiated with federal prosecutors, before Rainey and Williams struck plea deals that allowed them to simply remain in Canada. Then, last September, Emery himself agreed to a plea bargain that would see him serve five years in US prison.

Emery was detained in Canada on September 28 and was jailed until mid-November before he was released pending the justice minister's decision on whether to approve his removal to the United States. Since then, the campaign to block his extradition has gone all out. Even in prison, Emery did podcasts -- "potcasts," the magazine calls them -- and since his release, he has been as media-friendly as ever. He has used his Cannabis Culture magazine as a bully pulpit and established a No Extradition! web site to further the cause.

The high point of the campaign so far came on March 12 when three members of parliament, Conservative MP Scott Reid, New Democratic MP Libby Davies, and Liberal MP Ujjal Dosanjh stood before parliament in Ottawa to deliver the petitions. All three told the Commons that extraditing Emery for what is considered a non-serious offense in Canada was unfair.

MP Reid, a Conservative leader in the House, reminded the Commons that the Extradition Act specifies that the justice minister "shall refuse to surrender a person when that surrender could involve unjust or undue or oppressive actions by the country to which he is being extradited."

Last Updated on Sunday, 02 May 2010 08:21
Read more...
 
«StartPrev1234567NextEnd»

Page 1 of 7
Copyright © 2010 Robert_R_Ryan. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
 

Polls

When will Marijuana once again be legal in USA?